The correct answer is A. Although a landlord is not
entitled to retain part or all of a deposit to compensate for “normal
wear and tear,” the Uniform Owner-Resident Relations Act does not
consider uncleanliness part of the normal wear and tear. It could be
argued that since Edward knew Kat would be sculpting in the house, her
stone dust would fall under the Act’s definition of “normal
wear and tear” because
it is deterioration that occurs based upon the use for which the rental
unit is intended. However, it seems more appropriate that the accumulation
of dust would be considered “uncleanliness” and therefore
Edward correctly withheld the $100 for cleaning purposes.You are correct! Proceed to Exercise 9 >